Sunday, December 27, 2009

CHRISTMAS..............................?

JESUS WAS BORN ON 25 DECEMBER-------------NO EVIDENCE!
some eastern national churches, including those of Russia, Georgia,Egypt, Armenia, Ukraine, FYROM and Serbia celebrate on January 7.
Throughout the holiday's history, Christmas has been the subject of both controversy and criticism from a wide variety of different sources. The first documented Christmas controversy was Christian-led, and began during the English Interregnum, when England was ruled by a PuritanParliament. Puritans (including those who fled to America) sought to remove the remaining pagan elements of Christmas. During this period, the English Parliament banned the celebration of Christmas entirely, considering it "a popish festival with no biblical justification", and a time of wasteful and immoral behavior.
Controversy and criticism continues in the present-day, where some Christian and non-Christians have claimed that an affront to Christmas (dubbed a "war on Christmas" by some) is ongoing. In the United States there has been a tendency to replace the greeting Merry Christmas with Happy Holidays. Groups such as the American Civil Liberties Union have initiated court cases to bar the display of images and other material referring to Christmas from public property, including schools. Such groups argue that government-funded displays of Christmas imagery and traditions violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits the establishment by Congress of a national religion. In 1984, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Lynch vs. Donnelly that a Christmas display (which included a Nativity scene) owned and displayed by the city of Pawtucket, Rhode Island did not violate the First Amendment. In November 2009, the Federal appeals court in Philadelphia endorsed a school district's ban on the singing of Christmas carols.
In the private sphere also, it has been alleged that any specific mention of the term "Christmas" or its religious aspects was being increasinglycensored, avoided, or discouraged by a number of advertisers and retailers. In response, the American Family Association and other groups have organized boycotts of individual retailers.." In the United Kingdom there have also been some controversies, one of the most famous being the temporary promotion of the Christmas period as Winterval by Birmingham City Council in 1998. There were also protests in November 2009 when the city of Dundee promoted its celebrations as the Winter Night Light festival, initially with no specific Christmas references.
The name Christmas comes from an imaginary character- Father Christmas/Saint Nicholas advertized throughout the world as Santa Claus which again has nothing to do with 25 December.
All the above information has nothing to do with we- Bharatiya people, our history, traditions or culture.
Jesus Christ itself is a dubious character, being born to a virgin--WHO IS JESUS'S FATHER?
How can a man come out of the grave 3 days after his death?
Was He married, had He children too. Refer Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code.
CHRISTIANITY HAS CALLED US PAGANS AND THEREFORE THE MISSIONARIES HAVE A TARGET TO CONVERT ALL PAGANS (HINDUS) TO CHRISTIANITY.
SADLY CHRISTMAS IS BEING CELEBRATED IN OUR SCHOOLS TODAY, WHERE THE STUDENTS ARE NOT TAUGHT ABOUT OUR OWN CULTURE AND TRADITIONS. THE SCHOOLS RUN BY SANATAN DHARMA, ARYA SAMAJ, JAIN SAMAJ ETC. ARE TOO FOUND CELEBRATING CHRISTMAS WITHOUT KNOWING ITS SIGNIFICANCE AT ALL.
Let's pause, think and try to evaluate the celebration of Christmas. Celebrating Christmas represent nothing but our slave mentality for the English and the west and our Inclination towards a religion- Christianity, which calls us pagans and has not been behind Islam in unleashing violent CRUSADES throughout the world to convert others to Christianity.
Dr. Jai Prakash Gupta. Ambala Cantt.
Mob. 9315510425

Saturday, May 16, 2009

Lok Sabha Results-2009

I think, my optimism over the justification of Indian voter has once again failed or I may say that the majority of Indian voter who votes (The tragedy being that only 50% of the eligible voters poll their votes), has barred his thought process to only 3 things.1. His traditional voting pattern, 2. The fulfillment of his selfish motives and 3. The monetary benefits.
The Kandahar episode had opened the unfortunate facts about the mentality of the people in general who did not press the day's government not to succumb to the hijackers demands, Instead they forced the Government to take that Unfortunate decision of release of the dreaded terrorists.
The media which waged an unnecessary war against Pakistan after Mumbai (26-11) terrorist attacks, made an anti national contribution by forcing the NDA Government take the most unfortunate decision of the release of terrorists.
It seems, the congress with all its anti national and anti hindu mind understands the mind of the voter better than anyone else. Their strategy being- Loot, Divide the general voter and create confusion. Pour money wherever en-masse votes are expected. Keep the blind flock solidly behind congress reminding the contribution of the congress in the Independence struggle. Strengthen vote banks by raising the reservations to more flocks, Keep the issue of communalism- Secularism alive without explaining the real meaning of these words. Strengthen the Non Hindu religious groups by showing them the fear of Hindus even at the cost of national security. The results of the elections are a clear indication that the voters are not concerned with the Sustained Price rise of essential commodities, spread of the terror networks throughout the length and breadth of the country, scarcity of essential commodities, deteriorating security concerns in the neighboring countries, failing economy, exports, manufacturing sector, agricultural production. The voter also seems to be unconcerned about the insult of the Institutions, autocratic use of the premier institutions.
Considering the tally that has given the congress a comfortable boost means that the voter voted for either the raised pay packet, that may be understood. But what about others?
The people of this country should not blame the politicians or the Government for Terrorism- Inflation- corruption etc., etc. They are themselves to be blamed for this. They have chosen these virtues.
I was elated over the people's contribution on national issues on the internet. The contributors on blogs, communities, social networking sites were decisively campaigning nationalism in a big way. Yet, probably we could not end up with the votes. May be, many on the internet did not cast their own votes!
I am not only worried that BJP has lost or we could not have Shri Lal Krishna Advani ji as the Prime Minister, I am depressed because the nation has lost an opportunity to have a brilliant Prime Minister and a nationalist government.
Moreover, the seats that the congress is getting make me worried about the future trend of their divisive politics that could disintegrate this society further.
Is there any remedy in sight?
Yes1 there may be, but we shall have to work very hard. Let's resolve to work very hard these next 5 years to go to the people and convince them of the realities. Let's go to the colleges, universities and chat with the students. Let "Secularism" be the issue of debate throughout the country. Let's leace the freebies to the politicians and spread the nationalist thought throughout the length and breadth of the country.
BJP shall have to make groups of individuals for this daunting task, without which the nation is bound to suffer at the merciless hands of the secularists.
Dr. Jai Prakash Gupta. Ambala.
+91-9315510425

Thursday, April 16, 2009

Saviours of English

Macaulay, while introduced English medium education policy in India, he has a vision to make the Indian people blind about their own languages and culture along with history, so that India remains slave of the English for centuries to come. His vision and subsequent actions of the British of the introduction of the education policy has paid rich dividends. The educated elite of this country which calls itself an independent sovereign state have become the saviours of the language of our former Masters, who looted us of our wealth for centuries together.
The issue of English as a language of Indians has once again cropped up, thanks to its opposition in the election manifesto of a Secular ( Samajvadi Party), led by a leader of the most important political state of India- Uttar Pradesh, Mr. Mulayam Singh Yadav.
As expected, it has been largely opposed by the mainline English loving media. The criticism of the language issue makes one feel as if India thrives on English language alone & without English, we stand nowhere. It is also emphasized time and again that English is a world language and it is the language of progress and prosperity. Some have even said that by opposing English, we shall go to Stone Age.
History tells us that the English robbed us of our language, history, culture, traditions and Physical wealth.
Making a moving reference to the use of computers, which is also attached in this controversy, due to the party’s reference to it, we are again been told that in computer age we can’t move without English. It is also being reminded to us that India has gained reputation because of the English knowing IT professionals. Yes, no doubt our IT engineers have relentlessly worked for the Microsoft and other multinational IT giants and developed various programmes and software for them. Yet let us look at the situation of the national language of India- Hindi or other Indian languages vis-à-vis Computer word. Let’s quickly look at the languages supported by the Microsoft, whose windows are in use in India along with rest of the world. Here is a list for the ready reference via http://support.microsoft.com/kb/292246
Windows XP / 2003 languages

1. Afrikaans,
2. Albanian
3. Azeri(Cyrillic)
4. Azeri(Latin)
5. Basque
6. Belarusian
7. Bulgarian
8. Catalan
9. Croatian
10. Czech
11. Danish
12. Dutch (Belgium)
13. Dutch(Netherlands)
14. English (Australia)
15. English (Belize)
16. English (Canada)
17. English (Caribbean)
18. English (Ireland)
19. English (Jamaica)
20. English (New Zealand)
21. English (Philippines)
22. English (South Africa)
23. English (Trinidad)
24. English (United Kingdom)
25. English (United States)
26. English (Zimbabwe)
27. Estonian
28. Faeroese
29. Finnish
30. French (Belgium)
31. French (Canada)
32. French (France)
33. France (Luxembourg)
34. French (Monaco)
35. French (Switzerland)
36. Galician
37. German (Austria)
38. German (Germany)
39. German (Liechtenstein)
40. German (Luxembourg)
41. German (Switzerland)
42. Greek
43. Hungarian
44. Icelandic
45. Indonesian
46. Italian (Italy)
47. Italian (Switzerland)
48. Japanese
49. Latvian
50. Lithuanian
51. Macedonian (FYROM)
52. Malay(Brunei Darussalam)
53. Malay (Malaysia)
54. Mongolian (Cyrillic)
55. Norwegian (Bokmal)
56. Norwegian (Nynorsk)
57. Polish
58. Portuguese (Brazil)
59. Portuguese (Portugal)
60. Romanian
61. Russian
62. Serbian (Cyrillic)
63. Serbian (Latin)
64. Slovak
65. Slovenian
66. Spanish (Bolivia)
67. Spanish (Chile)
68. Spanish (Colombia)
69. Spanish (Costa Rica)
70. Spanish (Dominican Republic)
71. Spanish (Ecuador)
72. Spanish (El Salvador)
73. Spanish (Guatemala)
74. Spanish (Honduras)
75. Spanish (International Sort)
76. Spanish (Mexico)
77. Spanish (Nicaragua)
78. Spanish (Panama)
79. Spanish (Paraguay)
80. Spanish (Peru)
81. Spanish (Puerto Rico)
82. Spanish (Traditional Sort)
83. Spanish (Uruguay)
84. Spanish (Venezuela)
85. Swahili
86. Swedish
87. Swedish (Finland)
88. Tatar
89. Turkish
90. Ukrainian
91. Uzbek(Cyrillic)
92. Uzbek (Latin

With 92 languages on board, we can imagine the failure of Indian governments and IT professionals for not pursuing the cause of Indian national language in Microsoft. But then, we can understand this dilemma with its roots in the understanding of Indian nation. The greatest congress leader had commented that we are in the process of making of nation. The same Pandit Javahar Lal prevented India to have its national language as Hindi. Since then every attempt has been made to promote the English language at the cost of our national language Hindi. The high profile English media has throughout supported this anti national cause of Nehru Gandhi dynasty.
While, this has been the state of affairs, the furious reaction of the media against the opposition of English by a political group can be well understood.
While I am not supportive of the posture placed in the SP election manifesto against the English language and computers, I am convinced that there is a serious flaw in our attitude towards our national language- Hindi vis-à-vis English and we need its immediate solution in favour of Hindi as the first language. With the decline of our interest in Hindi and Sanskrit, we should be ready to lose our national identity. There shall be no BHARAT and whatever India remains shall not identify itself with the proud culture roots that BHARAT possesses.


Dr. Jai Prakash Gupta. Ambala Cantt.
+91-9315510425

Sunday, April 5, 2009

धर्मनिरपेक्षता और भारतीय राजनीति

भारतीय समाज यों तो अनेक प्रकार से विभाजित है यथा जाति- पन्थ- वर्ग- समुदाय- भाषा आदि आदि, किन्तु एक आयातित शब्द व विचारधारा SECULARISM ने भारतीय राजनीति को जिस प्रमाण में प्रभावित किया है, सम्भवत: किसी अन्य ने नहीं किया। भारतीय राजनीति के दो मुख्य ध्रुव हैं- एक हैं SECULAR व दूसरे COMMUNAL. यद्यपि यह दोनों शब्द मूलत: विदेशी हैं व विचार भी विदेशी किन्तु अपने प्रगतिशील राजनेताओं व बुद्धिजीवियों के लिये ये ही सर्वाधिक महत्वपूर्ण हैं। यहां यह स्पष्ट कर देना उत्तम होगा कि SECULARISM नामक विचारधारा पश्चिमी राज्यों में CHURCH द्वारा किए गए अमानवीय अत्याचारों व शासन में अनुचित हस्तक्षेप के कारण उस समाज में उस अत्याचार से बचाव के अस्त्र के रूप में जन्मी व विकसित हुई तथा उन्हीं सभ्यताओं में समाज के विभिन्न वर्गों को COMMUNES नाम से जानने के कारण तथा विभिन्न COMMUNES में हिंसक संघर्षों की विद्यमानता से COMMUNAL शब्द अस्तित्व में आया। भारत में ऐसी स्थिति कभी नहीं थी। न तो यहां RELIGION व COMMUNE जैसे शब्द थे तथा न ही विचार। धर्म नाम से जिस विचार का प्रतिपादन भारतीय परम्परा में किया गया उसका RELIGION, सम्प्रदाय, मत, पन्थ अथवा मजहब से कोई सम्बन्ध नहीं है, किन्तु तो भी पराधीन भारतीय मानस ने धर्म को RELIGION का पर्याय स्वीकार कर यह विनाशकारी खेल भारत की राजनैतिक स्वाधीनता से पूर्व ही प्रारम्भ कर दिया गया था। इसी स्वीकारोक्ति ने १९४७ में भारत का विभाजन कराया तथा यही विचारधारा आज पुन: भारतमाता के रूप में राष्ट्रीय स्वाभिमान को प्रतिष्ठित करने का स्वप्न देखने वालों के लिए सबसे भयंकर चुनौती बनी हुई है। धर्मनिरपेक्षता नाम से SECULARISM शब्द का अनुवाद करने वालों को साधुवाद, क्योंकि वास्तव में भारत में यही इसका व्यवहारिक अर्थ है।
SECULARISM में अंग्रेजी व उर्दू स्वीकार्य हैं हिन्दी नहीं।
SECULARISM में स्वयं को हिन्दु से पृथक कहने वाले उत्तम हैं, हिन्दु निकृष्ट।
SECULARISM में भारत कभी एक राष्ट्र था ही नहीं अंग्रेजों व कांग्रेस ने यह राष्ट्र बनाया अत: इस राष्ट्र के पति (HUSBAND अथवा स्वामी) कांग्रेस के सबसे बड़े नेता म. गांधी हैं व इस देश की राष्ट्रभाषा अंग्रेजी।
SECULARISM का अर्थ है कि राम एक मिथ्या पात्र हैं तथा इसी प्रकार अपने वेद- पुराण- रामायण- महाभारत आदि सभी काल्पनिक व मिथ्या हैं, जबकि क़ुरान व BIBLE पवित्र ग्रन्थ हैं। अत: हिन्दु को ईसाई अथवा मुसलमान बनाना पवित्र कृत्य हैं व प्रोत्साहन योग्य।
SECULARISM आयुर्वेद, योग, ज्योतिष, तन्त्र, दर्शन आदि को त्याज्य मानता है।
SECULARISM वन्देमातरम को, रामजन्मस्थान- अयोध्या, व प्रत्येक हिन्दु विचार को त्याज्य व हेय मानता है।
SECULARISM की गौरवशाली गाथाओं से भारत के इतिहास के असंख्य पृष्ठ भरे पड़े हैं। आज इन पर दृष्टिपात करने का अवसर है।
आइये अपने निजी स्वार्थों की तिलाजलि दे इस लोकसभा चुनाव में SECULARISM के इस भयंकर राक्षस का वध करके अपने राष्ट्र की अस्मिता को अक्षुण्ण बनाएं।
डॉ. जय प्रकाश गुप्त, अम्बाला छावनी।
+९१-९३१५५१०४२५

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Valentine and RSS.

The Sunday Express column `All in the name of Hindu Culture’ (Feb.15-2009) has made my darling columnist Tavleen Singh far away from my noble thoughts about her. Her `politically incorrect’ columns have been some bold initiatives unfound in today’s journalism. Her smart analysis of jihad, madarsas and secularism has been widely appreciated by the nationalist intellectuals throughout. Yet her views about the controversy of protests against Valentine- Pubs gives rise to many questions.
Yes, you have the right to criticize elements opposed to the Un-Indian celebrations, by virtue of your biased education (admitted by Tavleen Singh), but is it not the other way round too? Those whose open eyes and minds feel offended by the open love-sex culture via valentine must also have the equal right to oppose the malady. The widely exaggerated media reports suggest the opposition of Valentine generally peaceful, some aberrations notwithstanding. Yet media calls these people Taliban- Gundaas- Criminals- Enemies of Love etc., etc. Are you the votery of making this country a free sex society? And Tavleen ji, you too are demanding strictest punishment for them! Oh! Tell me by your logic what should be done with the people behaving indecent in public in the name of valentine and what should be done to the supporters of this unsocial evil?
Painfully Tavleen has not stopped here. She rejects Shri Lal Krishna Advani’s candidature on this premise with a wonderful logic the Advani did not make a statement against this. Is it such a big issue for the leader of opposition to comment? The UPA leaders have spoken against pub culture. What to do about them? Most painful is her comment against the RSS chief. Can she tell any role of Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh in this controversy?
The nation and its people are mature enough to take their decisions. If they alongwith you (Tavleen) are opposed to UPA’s antinational leadership the natural alternative for them is BJP and Shri Lal Krishna Advani. People would not opt for a chaos without NDA, I am confident. Those who draw inspiration from India’s golden past shall naturally accept RSS’s ideology of Cultural Nationalism, whatever you say through your columns, Madam!
Dr. Jai Prakash Gupta. Ambala.
+91-9315510425